Implanted telemetry is established as the gold standard for preclinical Drug Development, Safety Pharmacology and Toxicology studies.
This technique allows researchers to record physiological measurements from laboratory animals that were surgically implanted, and to transmit them wirelessly to a distant receiver and computer for monitoring and analysis.
Let’s understand how it evolved in the last decade and what are the current challenges faced by scientists.
From analog to digital
The first generation of implanted telemeters were purely analog. These legacy implants transmitted data on a single frequency, which could lead to crosstalk between different subjects.
In addition, their limited transmission range prevented their use in larger cages where a “buddy” animal could interact with the subject under study.
The advent of digital telemetry, coupled with its ability to send data on different transmission channels and over longer distances, helped overcome these limitations and facilitated group housing.
Telemetry permits social housing and reduces stress
In 1996, van Acker et al. compared implanted ECG monitoring to other approaches like morphometry and histology outcomes in a drug-induced cardiotoxicity study. The researchers showed that implanted telemetry studies could lead to a reduction of animal use by more than 90%1.
ECG monitoring via implanted telemetry provides higher sensitivity and reproducibility than alternative approaches by minimizing confounding factors such as anaesthesia and restraint or handler-induced stress.
Digital telemetry systems can usually be remotely controlled and configured, reducing human interaction at the minimum.
Furthermore, implanted telemetry enables longitudinal monitoring of sensitive and clinically relevant outcomes such as QT prolongation or arrhythmia identification.
We invite you to read our detailed Technical Note to better understand how social housing impacts the subject’s wellbeing and the quality of the data collected. In addition, we discuss the limitations and what the potential barriers to group-housing are.