Maximizing Insights from Preclinical Safety Studies in the context of rising costs and shortages
During the 2023 Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) Conference in Brussels, scientists from leading preclinical contract organizations (CROs) discussed how traditional IND-enabling studies involving primates and dogs can be complemented (and sometimes even replaced) by alternative models such as mice, rats, rabbits and pigs.
The inclusion of non-traditional models in safety pharmacology studies can help scientists de-risk compounds early on, adapt their project to the context of rising costs, and offer unique biological insights, especially for new modalities such as gene and cellular therapies.
Re-thinking species selection in safety studies
Tracing back to the FDA’s inception in 1937, the guidance required preclinical testing of new drugs and biologicals for pharmacologic activity and acute toxicity in animals prior to their use in clinical trials. The use of two animal species, a rodent and a larger non-rodent mammal, for toxicological studies were established.
Though the recently adopted FDA modernization act no longer mandates animal testing, the use of animal species for IND-enabling studies remains a cornerstone of drug safety.
The selection criteria, guided by the FDA and EMA, encompass animal, environmental and physiological attributes that simulate the clinical setting, with scientific information justifying the appropriateness of the chosen animal model. A comprehensive understanding of the subject’s anatomy, physiology, and baseline values is critical to understand and contextualize the results. The table below provides cardiovascular comparative physiology references:
In the 1960s and 1970s, most drugs developed were chemical entities. Dogs and NHPs were commonly used for drug development due to their availability and cost-effectiveness. They provided effective models for adverse drug effects and yielded vast amounts of scientific reference data.
The rise of complex molecules such as biologics impacts preclinical safety considerations. Indeed, biologics account for over 40% of FDA-approved drugs and there have been over a thousand ongoing clinical studies for cellular and gene therapies in 2023. These new drug modalities present unique challenges for preclinical safety studies, as a single administration can have effects over many months. They also offer reduced toxicological risks compared to small chemical entities. Indeed, small molecule drugs present more off-target effects and toxicological risks than biologics, which are purposefully designed to interact with the immune system.
Safety Pharmacologists therefore face a unique opportunity to improve the translational value of preclinical assays for biologics, by combining non-traditional animal species with advanced measurement techniques such as implantable telemetry. easyTEL+ implantable telemetry, allows scientists to derive maximal insights (ECG, Blood Pressure, Respiration) from animal studies in a natural, stress-free context, during extended monitoring period of several days or even months.
Today, IND-enabling studies still rely on data from dogs and NHPs, since their close genetic proximity to humans allow them to exhibit target-binding characteristics as well as the associated desired pharmacological effect sought in humans. But alternative models are also being explored. With the increasing costs of preclinical studies and the intensification of ethical concerns associated with the use of companion animals for scientific research, scientists are re-discovering alternative models such as pigs, rats and rabbits to better predict human toxicity. These models are combined with complementary assays such as 3D cell cultures, organoids, organ slices, Novel Alternative Methods (NAMS), and in silico methods, to better inform biomedical research projects.
The articles below summarize some of the key points that were presented during the 2023 Safety Pharmacology Society Partner Talk, in Brussels. They include the video recording of each talk.
Swine, the "other large animal" tox species
Dr. Donald Hodges (CBSET, MA, USA) discussed the history, regulatory framework and other factors influencing species selection in IND-enabling studies.
He outlined how proven translational characteristics and historical data are enabling the wider adoption of swine as an alternative to dogs and Non-Human Primates in the context of shortages and rising costs.
Dr. Michael Stonerook (AmplifyBio, OH, USA) highlighted the benefits and limitations of the rat model for cardiovascular screening assays.
He explained how the rat can play a critical role in cost-effective screening modalities, provided scientists understand the model organism’s anatomy and physiology.
Taking advantage of new models & tools to rethink efficacy and Safety Research
Dr. Dany Salvail (IPST, QC, Canada) explained how experienced pharmacologists rely on alternate models combined with sophisticated measurement techniques that go well beyond the ICH guidelines to help sponsors truly understand and quantify liabilities associated with their lead compounds early on.
IPS’s flexible approach allows their scientists to rapidly adapt study designs and, if needed, conduct complementary safety and efficacy assays at minimal additional cost to better characterize physiological effects of compounds.
When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Control your personal Cookie Services here.